Functional Safety: New Vehicle Development Compliance
Functional Safety: New Vehicle Development Compliance
Introduction: Functional Safety
First, Functional Safety is the cornerstone of modern automotive system design, ensuring that electronic/electrical (E/E) systems behave predictably under fault conditions. Next, this article defines fundamental terminology such as hazards, risks, and Automotive Safety Integrity Levels (ASILs). Following that, we outline the ISO 26262 lifecycle, highlighting key phases from hazard analysis to verification. Finally, we examine design techniques—including redundancy, diagnostics, and safety mechanisms—that engineers use to achieve targeted ASIL requirements.
Consequently, as automotive systems become increasingly complex, advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) and software-defined vehicles (SDV) integrate more electronics and software than ever before. Furthermore, ensuring Functional Safety—the absence of unreasonable risk due to system malfunction—has never been more critical. Moreover, by following the ISO 26262 standard, OEMs and suppliers establish a systematic framework to manage safety risks throughout development and production.
Additionally, transitioning from theoretical safety models to real-world implementation demands a clear grasp of both terminology and process. Therefore, we begin by defining core concepts before exploring the structured phases of the ISO 26262 lifecycle.
Core Definitions & Terminology
Generally, to navigate ISO 26262 efficiently, it is essential to understand its key terms:
- Hazard: A potential source of harm caused by system behavior under a fault.
- Risk: The combination of the probability of occurrence and the severity of harm.
- ASIL (Automotive Safety Integrity Level): A risk-based classification (A–D) that dictates required rigor; ASIL D represents the highest safety requirement.
- Safe State: A defined system condition in which residual risk is tolerable.
By clearly distinguishing between hazards and risks, teams can systematically assess and mitigate threats through targeted ASIL assignments.
ISO 26262 Lifecycle & ASIL Determination
ISO 26262 organizes Functional Safety activities into the following phases:
- Concept Phase (Part 3):
- Item Definition: Describe the system and its boundaries.
- Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA): Identify hazards and assign ASILs based on severity, exposure, and controllability.
- System-Level Development (Parts 4 & 5):
- System Design: Define safety goals and allocate Functional Safety requirements.
- Safety Validation: Confirm that safety goals are met via analysis and testing.
- Hardware and Software Development (Parts 6 & 7):
- Hardware Architectural Metrics: Analyze fault rates and diagnostic coverage.
- Software Unit and Integration: Implement and verify software to meet derived safety requirements.
- Production, Operation & Service (Part 8):
- Safety Management: Maintain processes for change management, incident analysis, and recalls.
In each phase, traceability is paramount, linking requirements to implementation and verification activities to demonstrate compliance.
Design Techniques for Fail Safe Behavior
Once ASILs are assigned, engineers apply specific techniques to achieve the requisite safety integrity:
- Redundancy: Employ primary and secondary components to take over in case of failure.
- Self-Diagnostics: Integrate built-in tests to detect faults in sensors, actuators, and software.
- Fault Containment Zones (FCZ): Partition architecture to isolate failures and prevent cascading.
- Watchdog Timers & Heartbeats: Monitor software execution to detect lockups or timing errors.
- Diverse Implementation: Use different hardware or software approaches (e.g., dual-channel processors) to protect against systematic faults.
Collectively, these techniques enhance diagnostic coverage and ensure that, upon fault detection, the system transitions to a defined safe state without endangering occupants.
Conclusion: Functional Safety Series
In summary, this article has established the fundamental terminology, outlined the ISO 26262 lifecycle phases, and presented essential design techniques for achieving automotive Functional Safety. Moving forward, subsequent articles will delve into detailed case studies, regulatory and supplier roles, advanced validation methods, EV/ADAS/SDV considerations, and emerging trends, providing a comprehensive roadmap for practitioners and decision-makers.
Series Positioning & Next Steps
Real-World Case Studies & Lessons Learned
Regulatory Compliance & Supplier Roles
Validation & Verification Techniques
Functional Safety in EV/ADAS/SDV
Emerging Trends: AI & Over-the-Air Updates
Series Index:
- Foundations & Frameworks: An ISO 26262 Guide to Automotive Functional Safety: ← You are here
- ISO 26262 Design Process: From Safety Goals to Implementation: https://georgedallen.com/why-functional-safety-matters-new-vehicle-development/
- ASIL Decomposition and Redundancy Management: https://georgedallen.com/functional-safety-new-vehicle-development-iso-standards/
- Functional Safety Implementation in Vehicle Platforms
- The Role of Functional Safety in ADAS and Autonomous Systems
- Why Functional Safety still fails
Designing for Lifecycle Assurance and Post-SOP Safety Monitoring
Other References:
- International Organization for Standardization. ISO 26262: Road vehicles — Functional safety. 2018.
- W. Steiner, “ASIL Determination and Application in Automotive Design,” SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars – Electronic and Electrical Systems, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 175‑183, 2019.
- K. Jackson and T. Gallagher, “Design for Functional Safety,” in Advanced Automotive Technologies, Springer, 2020, pp. 45‑68.
- S. Chen, “Fault Containment Zones in Automotive Architectures,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 5032‑5042, 2020.
- Bosch GmbH, “Automotive Safety Handbook,” Bosch, 2021.
Systems Engineering References:
- V-Model reference: https://georgedallen.com/systems-v-model-strategy-in-automotive-design/
- HARA reference: https://www.embitel.com/blog/embedded-blog/hara-by-iso-26262-standard-for-your-functional-safety-project
- ASIL reference: https://www.jamasoftware.com/requirements-management-guide/automotive-engineering/guide-to-automotive-safety-integrity-levels-asil/
- https://georgedallen.com/new-engineering-ethics-fundamentals-of-product-development/
- https://georgedallen.com/objectivist-philosophy-in-new-engineering-ethics/
About George D. Allen Consulting:
George D. Allen Consulting is a pioneering force in driving engineering excellence and innovation within the automotive industry. Led by George D. Allen, a seasoned engineering specialist with an illustrious background in occupant safety and systems development, the company is committed to revolutionizing engineering practices for businesses on the cusp of automotive technology. With a proven track record, tailored solutions, and an unwavering commitment to staying ahead of industry trends, George D. Allen Consulting partners with organizations to create a safer, smarter, and more innovative future. For more information, visit www.GeorgeDAllen.com.
Contact:
Website: www.GeorgeDAllen.com
Email: inquiry@GeorgeDAllen.com
Phone: 248-509-4188
Unlock your engineering potential today. Connect with us for a consultation.
